Thursday, 26th June 2003
Cure for indecision
All this time I've been relying on other people's recommendations to seek out new books (despite the large number of books that I buy, I will only very rarely buy one about which I've heard nothing) when instead I should have gone to whichbook.net. It allows you to define your parameters for the next book you want to read according to mood, style, plot, character and location, and will then present you with a list to choose from, each choice accompanied by a short list of similar books and a short extract. (And I do mean short - I don't think one paragraph is really enough to judge writing style by.) Better yet, it's linked to a database of UK libraries, and will tell you how many copies your nearest library has should you want to borrow it.
I haven't tested it very extensively yet, but I did try picking specific books and trying to get the right result from the search criteria - for Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials I asked for "Extremely Larger than life" and "Extremely Beautiful" ("Larger than life/Down to earth" and "Beautiful/Disgusting" being two of the categories you can pick) and bingo, Northern Lights came up as the top match. Although conversely Wild Swans failed to come up under the search terms of "Character: female, asian; Plot: generations; Location: China", which was slightly worrying.
Anyway, the next time I run out of books to read (probably about 2005), I'll give it a look.

Comments
You might also wants to check out Gnooks, part of Gnod. I visited a few months ago and that's kept me going since. Gnooks seems to me to have a nicer interface than whichbook, although that's mainly down to the horrible use of Flash (whichbook) vs the way cool JavaScript 'readership maps' (Gnooks). I also happen to prefer the Gnooks way of doing it in general, going from writers you already like rather than starting from scratch. But maybe that's just me.
Wow, that does look good - I hadn't seen it before. And yes, I agree about the use of Flash on the whichbook site if they didn't provide a text-only version (although TBH the text version looks like a bit of an afterthought).
add a comment